Misinformed
She had a client lie to her and didn't bother to check facts that were easily accessible. Still took
the case and when she was embarrassed in court chose to MADDOG the opposing respondents in the court
room. Knowingly, she still proceeded to take on client with false information and wants to appeal
the decision by using The Hague Convention as her defense, which is completely assinine. She knows
that won't fly.... perhaps trying to run up a tab on her client? Most definitely!